Liberals Are More Likely to Block You on Facebook for Posting About Politics

A fascinating new Pew Research Center study reveals how conservatives and liberals interact with their friends who post about politics on Facebook. Conservatives tend to have circles of friends who mirror their political views, and liberals are more likely to cut ties online with those who disagree with them politically.

Pew reports that “roughly 4 in 10 consistent liberals on Facebook (44%) say they have blocked or unfriended someone on social media because they disagreed with something the person posted about on politics.” In comparison, 31% of conservatives and only 26% of all Facebook users have reported to do the same:

But this doesn’t mean conservatives are more tolerant | Follow micdotcom

deanprincesster:

carryontoabetterplaceabettertime:

deanprincesster:

the catholic church gives wine to 7 year olds but gay marriage is wrong

I mean this is totally out of context but is technically true. It is believed to be the blood of god and they are only given 1 tiny sip once a week but otherwise this is totally correct.

the catholic church encourages 7 year olds to drink blood every week but gay marriage is wrong

mockeryd:

didyaknowanimation:

Oh boy guys it’s a nice new template! This one was designed by miss-hudders and I think it looks great :)
Source

It was 3rd in place at the box office it’s opening weekend and managed to make $17,005,218 in the United States and and made $25,377,218 in other countries. It’s almost made it’s budget back.
So yeah, those people who told him that a Hispanic story wasn’t universal were wrong as fuck.

mockeryd:

didyaknowanimation:

Oh boy guys it’s a nice new template! This one was designed by miss-hudders and I think it looks great :)

Source

It was 3rd in place at the box office it’s opening weekend and managed to make $17,005,218 in the United States and and made $25,377,218 in other countries. It’s almost made it’s budget back.

So yeah, those people who told him that a Hispanic story wasn’t universal were wrong as fuck.

prayforfele:

theperksofbeinga-cunt:

yourpunkassbookjockey:

spookypucci:

ithotyouknew:

lowcutcaesar:

hip-hop-lifestyle:

brownglucose:

imsoshive:

She on beat like a muhhfucka

image

shoutout to her for being so positive while going through chemo

i love her positivity and energy so much, i fuck wit this.

This legit made me smile, slé

This deadass how I dance at parties. Bless this white woman.

@fuckboysupreme yooooo why does this women this woman think she’s you?? explain. 

Ok first off. Woof, can I have your number. Also, her make up and outfit are super cute. Legit made me cheese and dance along with her. Who is she? I want to send her a card lol

Omfgggghg I love everything about this video and her ass 😍😍😍😍😍 sorry I’m a perv lol

She was so on point. I love it!!

Whatever America is we all are since we are Americans and what we all are (individually and collectively) isn’t making the situation any better if social outcomes are the decisive factor.
king-of-aces:

tmtp:

soloeaux:

Speaks for itself

Take note of the:
black runner’s awareness of what he’s facing;
judge’s position;
white runner with his head down (oblivious to his opponent’s path/what he has to go through) 

This is very deep.

king-of-aces:

tmtp:

soloeaux:

Speaks for itself

Take note of the:

  • black runner’s awareness of what he’s facing;
  • judge’s position;
  • white runner with his head down (oblivious to his opponent’s path/what he has to go through) 

This is very deep.

The ‘victim’ approach to the study of white women in the slave formation, therefore, has severe limitations… while white males were the predominant owners of slaves in the plantation sector, the same cannot be said for the urban sector. White women were generally the owners of small properties, rather than large estates, but their small properties were more proportionately stocked with slaves than the large, male owned properties.

In 1815, white women owned about 24 percent of the slaves in St Lucia; 12 per cent of the slaves on properties of more than 50 slaves, and 48 per cent of the properties with less than 10 slaves. In Barbados in 1817, less than five of the holdings of 50 slaves or more were owned by white women, but they owned 40 percent of the properties with less than 10 slaves…

White women also owned more female slaves than male slaves. The extensive female ownership of slaves in the towns was matched by the unusually high proportion of females in the slave population; female slave owners owned more female slaves than male slave owners….

From these data the image that emerges of the white female slaveowner is that she was generally urban, in possession of less than ten slaves, the majority of whom were female. That female slaveowners generally owned female slaves, indicates the nature of enterprises, and hence labour regimes, managed and owned by white women. It is reasonable, then, to argue that any conceptualization of urban slavery, especially with reference to the experiences of enslaved black women, should proceed with an explicit articulation of white women are principal slaveowners.

excerpt from Centering Woman: Gender Discourses in Caribbean Slave Society by Hilary McD Beckles  (via daniellemertina)

White feminists tend to conveniently forget this and pretend that they don’t benefit from white supremacy like white men (via thisisnotjapan)

this is some boston harbor level spilt tea

(via mimicryisnotmastery)

feminists-fighting-for-equality!! :)